<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Kindle Letdown</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stuffthathappens.com/blog/2009/02/10/kindle-letdown/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stuffthathappens.com/blog/2009/02/10/kindle-letdown/</link>
	<description>Technology and Geek Stuff by Eric Burke</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Nov 2010 22:37:00 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Vinayak</title>
		<link>http://stuffthathappens.com/blog/2009/02/10/kindle-letdown/comment-page-1/#comment-30639</link>
		<dc:creator>Vinayak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2009 13:19:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stuffthathappens.com/blog/?p=1013#comment-30639</guid>
		<description>My UI design team found out that it needs an ON/OFF button. One button will do. Separate buttons for ON and OFF are not required. Although they might be good for maintaining symmetry.

Also, the text &quot;I guess it needs a few more buttons?&quot; is not required to be printed on by ALL the users we surveyed. Most of them were of the opinion that if it is deemed really necessary by ERIC then it could be made &quot;SOFT&quot; as well.

Cheers. ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My UI design team found out that it needs an ON/OFF button. One button will do. Separate buttons for ON and OFF are not required. Although they might be good for maintaining symmetry.</p>
<p>Also, the text &#8220;I guess it needs a few more buttons?&#8221; is not required to be printed on by ALL the users we surveyed. Most of them were of the opinion that if it is deemed really necessary by ERIC then it could be made &#8220;SOFT&#8221; as well.</p>
<p>Cheers. <img src='http://stuffthathappens.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nils T. Devine</title>
		<link>http://stuffthathappens.com/blog/2009/02/10/kindle-letdown/comment-page-1/#comment-30385</link>
		<dc:creator>Nils T. Devine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 17:14:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stuffthathappens.com/blog/?p=1013#comment-30385</guid>
		<description>you&#039;re not alone.

http://www.baekdal.com/future/products/amazon-kindle-2-3/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you&#8217;re not alone.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.baekdal.com/future/products/amazon-kindle-2-3/" rel="nofollow">http://www.baekdal.com/future/products/amazon-kindle-2-3/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leon</title>
		<link>http://stuffthathappens.com/blog/2009/02/10/kindle-letdown/comment-page-1/#comment-30378</link>
		<dc:creator>Leon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 14:43:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stuffthathappens.com/blog/?p=1013#comment-30378</guid>
		<description>The disadvantages of soft keys are that touch screens are more expensive and that your screen gets dirty, making reading a bit more difficult.
I also think that physical buttons are stronger and as such a better option for often used functions; I&#039;d make the back/next/home buttons  physical in stead of soft to protect the screen.
The rest of the keyboard can be soft; you won&#039;t be writing all that much on it I think.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The disadvantages of soft keys are that touch screens are more expensive and that your screen gets dirty, making reading a bit more difficult.<br />
I also think that physical buttons are stronger and as such a better option for often used functions; I&#8217;d make the back/next/home buttons  physical in stead of soft to protect the screen.<br />
The rest of the keyboard can be soft; you won&#8217;t be writing all that much on it I think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Röthlisberger</title>
		<link>http://stuffthathappens.com/blog/2009/02/10/kindle-letdown/comment-page-1/#comment-30369</link>
		<dc:creator>John Röthlisberger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 08:08:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stuffthathappens.com/blog/?p=1013#comment-30369</guid>
		<description>Now you just need the arrows to have a slightly more hand-drawn look, and you&#039;re all set. =)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now you just need the arrows to have a slightly more hand-drawn look, and you&#8217;re all set. =)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Röthlisberger</title>
		<link>http://stuffthathappens.com/blog/2009/02/10/kindle-letdown/comment-page-1/#comment-30368</link>
		<dc:creator>John Röthlisberger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 08:07:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stuffthathappens.com/blog/?p=1013#comment-30368</guid>
		<description>Loving the new font -- MUCH better than the previous one (Tekton?).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Loving the new font &#8212; MUCH better than the previous one (Tekton?).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Burke</title>
		<link>http://stuffthathappens.com/blog/2009/02/10/kindle-letdown/comment-page-1/#comment-30343</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Burke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 02:14:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stuffthathappens.com/blog/?p=1013#comment-30343</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I wasn&#039;t sure about those two buttons. My design team is performing extensive usability studies as I type this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I wasn&#8217;t sure about those two buttons. My design team is performing extensive usability studies as I type this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thiago</title>
		<link>http://stuffthathappens.com/blog/2009/02/10/kindle-letdown/comment-page-1/#comment-30338</link>
		<dc:creator>Thiago</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 01:53:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stuffthathappens.com/blog/?p=1013#comment-30338</guid>
		<description>Why the two buttons in your Kindle prototype? Soft buttons for it, too! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why the two buttons in your Kindle prototype? Soft buttons for it, too! <img src='http://stuffthathappens.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Logan</title>
		<link>http://stuffthathappens.com/blog/2009/02/10/kindle-letdown/comment-page-1/#comment-30336</link>
		<dc:creator>Logan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 01:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stuffthathappens.com/blog/?p=1013#comment-30336</guid>
		<description>Tom, Amazon claims a 6&quot; diagonal on the screen.  A standard paperback page is more like an 8&quot; diagonal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom, Amazon claims a 6&#8243; diagonal on the screen.  A standard paperback page is more like an 8&#8243; diagonal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://stuffthathappens.com/blog/2009/02/10/kindle-letdown/comment-page-1/#comment-30332</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 00:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stuffthathappens.com/blog/?p=1013#comment-30332</guid>
		<description>Take another look at that picture. If you compare the area of the text on one of the pages of the book, it almost perfectly matches the screen size of the kindle, when you take the margin into account.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Take another look at that picture. If you compare the area of the text on one of the pages of the book, it almost perfectly matches the screen size of the kindle, when you take the margin into account.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.251 seconds -->

