<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Static Imports Rock</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stuffthathappens.com/blog/2007/11/13/static-imports-rock/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stuffthathappens.com/blog/2007/11/13/static-imports-rock/</link>
	<description>Technology and Geek Stuff by Eric Burke</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Nov 2010 22:37:00 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: j to</title>
		<link>http://stuffthathappens.com/blog/2007/11/13/static-imports-rock/comment-page-1/#comment-1460</link>
		<dc:creator>j to</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 18:07:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stuffthathappens.com/blog/2007/11/13/static-imports-rock/#comment-1460</guid>
		<description>Hi Eric, 

there is another project https://somnifugijms.dev.java.net/
that handles jms inside a JVM.

I agree though that exposing an event driven api seems to be better than using jms directly in some cases.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Eric, </p>
<p>there is another project <a href="https://somnifugijms.dev.java.net/" rel="nofollow">https://somnifugijms.dev.java.net/</a><br />
that handles jms inside a JVM.</p>
<p>I agree though that exposing an event driven api seems to be better than using jms directly in some cases.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Lewis</title>
		<link>http://stuffthathappens.com/blog/2007/11/13/static-imports-rock/comment-page-1/#comment-1406</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Lewis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 14:23:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stuffthathappens.com/blog/2007/11/13/static-imports-rock/#comment-1406</guid>
		<description>I meant to type Matchers actually.  Coffee should be kicking in at any time...

Speaking of Guice, don&#039;t you have to reference Guice API&#039;s to bootstrap the dependency injection?  In general how should &quot;third party&quot; libraries handle Guice?  As an app developer how should I handle libraries that use Guice?  Do I care?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I meant to type Matchers actually.  Coffee should be kicking in at any time&#8230;</p>
<p>Speaking of Guice, don&#8217;t you have to reference Guice API&#8217;s to bootstrap the dependency injection?  In general how should &#8220;third party&#8221; libraries handle Guice?  As an app developer how should I handle libraries that use Guice?  Do I care?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Burke</title>
		<link>http://stuffthathappens.com/blog/2007/11/13/static-imports-rock/comment-page-1/#comment-1405</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Burke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 13:29:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stuffthathappens.com/blog/2007/11/13/static-imports-rock/#comment-1405</guid>
		<description>@Dan I think to be consistent with Executors you&#039;d probably want something like Matchers, rather than Makers. MatcherMaker is just too good, though. It even has its own theme song. I can&#039;t see myself changing that... :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Dan I think to be consistent with Executors you&#8217;d probably want something like Matchers, rather than Makers. MatcherMaker is just too good, though. It even has its own theme song. I can&#8217;t see myself changing that&#8230; <img src='http://stuffthathappens.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Burke</title>
		<link>http://stuffthathappens.com/blog/2007/11/13/static-imports-rock/comment-page-1/#comment-1404</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Burke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 13:26:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stuffthathappens.com/blog/2007/11/13/static-imports-rock/#comment-1404</guid>
		<description>My Matcher is a subset of the Guice Matcher, and strictly a copy -- I only needed one method. While I compile ClassBus with Guice annotations, Guice JARs are entirely optional for applications using ClassBus.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My Matcher is a subset of the Guice Matcher, and strictly a copy &#8212; I only needed one method. While I compile ClassBus with Guice annotations, Guice JARs are entirely optional for applications using ClassBus.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Lewis</title>
		<link>http://stuffthathappens.com/blog/2007/11/13/static-imports-rock/comment-page-1/#comment-1403</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Lewis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 13:26:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stuffthathappens.com/blog/2007/11/13/static-imports-rock/#comment-1403</guid>
		<description>One other thing...I know you are proud of the name, but would the prevailing convention on class naming have MatcherMaker named Makers instead?  e.g. java.util.concurrent.Executors.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One other thing&#8230;I know you are proud of the name, but would the prevailing convention on class naming have MatcherMaker named Makers instead?  e.g. java.util.concurrent.Executors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Lewis</title>
		<link>http://stuffthathappens.com/blog/2007/11/13/static-imports-rock/comment-page-1/#comment-1402</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Lewis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 13:22:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stuffthathappens.com/blog/2007/11/13/static-imports-rock/#comment-1402</guid>
		<description>I agree that static imports can be a good thing.  It seems to me that when the feature came out in Java 5, there were some &quot;pitchfork&quot; people upset about it.  Hopefully one of them will show up and let us know all the downsides.

BTW I like the Matcher interface versus the combinatorial explosion of methods in the API.  And just to clarify, there&#039;s no runtime dependency on Guice, right?  Just the coincidence of having the same class name as one that&#039;s in Guice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that static imports can be a good thing.  It seems to me that when the feature came out in Java 5, there were some &#8220;pitchfork&#8221; people upset about it.  Hopefully one of them will show up and let us know all the downsides.</p>
<p>BTW I like the Matcher interface versus the combinatorial explosion of methods in the API.  And just to clarify, there&#8217;s no runtime dependency on Guice, right?  Just the coincidence of having the same class name as one that&#8217;s in Guice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Burke</title>
		<link>http://stuffthathappens.com/blog/2007/11/13/static-imports-rock/comment-page-1/#comment-1401</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Burke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 12:19:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stuffthathappens.com/blog/2007/11/13/static-imports-rock/#comment-1401</guid>
		<description>ClassBus is very similar to EventBus. I&#039;ll provide more details about this when I finish the online docs, but I did take a lot of inspiration from the EventBus project. In the end, I just felt like writing my own.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ClassBus is very similar to EventBus. I&#8217;ll provide more details about this when I finish the online docs, but I did take a lot of inspiration from the EventBus project. In the end, I just felt like writing my own.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Holger Brands</title>
		<link>http://stuffthathappens.com/blog/2007/11/13/static-imports-rock/comment-page-1/#comment-1388</link>
		<dc:creator>Holger Brands</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 06:25:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stuffthathappens.com/blog/2007/11/13/static-imports-rock/#comment-1388</guid>
		<description>The Glazed Lists project also has the concept of matcher for filter criteria.

Regarding your ClassBus project:
Do you know the EventBus project on java.net?
How does your project compare to it?

Thanks,
Holger</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Glazed Lists project also has the concept of matcher for filter criteria.</p>
<p>Regarding your ClassBus project:<br />
Do you know the EventBus project on java.net?<br />
How does your project compare to it?</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
Holger</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Lee</title>
		<link>http://stuffthathappens.com/blog/2007/11/13/static-imports-rock/comment-page-1/#comment-1381</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 02:50:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stuffthathappens.com/blog/2007/11/13/static-imports-rock/#comment-1381</guid>
		<description>MatcherMaker... wish I had thought of that. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MatcherMaker&#8230; wish I had thought of that. <img src='http://stuffthathappens.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.251 seconds -->

