<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: HOWTO: Configure IDEA Fonts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stuffthathappens.com/blog/2007/10/14/howto-configure-idea-fonts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stuffthathappens.com/blog/2007/10/14/howto-configure-idea-fonts/</link>
	<description>Technology and Geek Stuff by Eric Burke</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Nov 2010 22:37:00 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: James Guice</title>
		<link>http://stuffthathappens.com/blog/2007/10/14/howto-configure-idea-fonts/comment-page-1/#comment-6258</link>
		<dc:creator>James Guice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 11:06:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stuffthathappens.com/blog/2007/10/14/howto-configure-idea-fonts/#comment-6258</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the tip. IDEA 7 for me was using &quot;IDEA (4.5 default)&quot; as the theme. I already did have the &quot;Use anti-aliased font in editor&quot; checkbox turned on. Changing the the theme to &quot;Windows&quot;, I notice there is somewhat more anti-aliasing going on, but it still is poor quality compared to native ClearType. I don&#039;t want to understate things, so I will bluntly say that the overall text clarity is very very poor in IDEA vs. Eclipse. This means the editor text, the menu text, all of it.

I think there was an option in IDEA 6 to adjust the font kerning to better match the native platform, but that option seems gone. From what I understand that without special kerning, much of the goodness of sub-pixel rendering is not realized.

The choice to create SWT was a very good move on IBM&#039;s part. The years have shown that &quot;native Java&quot;    is a dead platform when it comes to building compelling end-user applications. Sun just doesn&#039;t &quot;get it&quot; when &quot;it&quot; has to do with anything outside of servers.

It&#039;s getting awfully hard to justify paying top dollar for a Java IDE that cannot even render text as well as the native platform. Maybe JetBrains should look at ditching Swing and moving to SWT...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the tip. IDEA 7 for me was using &#8220;IDEA (4.5 default)&#8221; as the theme. I already did have the &#8220;Use anti-aliased font in editor&#8221; checkbox turned on. Changing the the theme to &#8220;Windows&#8221;, I notice there is somewhat more anti-aliasing going on, but it still is poor quality compared to native ClearType. I don&#8217;t want to understate things, so I will bluntly say that the overall text clarity is very very poor in IDEA vs. Eclipse. This means the editor text, the menu text, all of it.</p>
<p>I think there was an option in IDEA 6 to adjust the font kerning to better match the native platform, but that option seems gone. From what I understand that without special kerning, much of the goodness of sub-pixel rendering is not realized.</p>
<p>The choice to create SWT was a very good move on IBM&#8217;s part. The years have shown that &#8220;native Java&#8221;    is a dead platform when it comes to building compelling end-user applications. Sun just doesn&#8217;t &#8220;get it&#8221; when &#8220;it&#8221; has to do with anything outside of servers.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s getting awfully hard to justify paying top dollar for a Java IDE that cannot even render text as well as the native platform. Maybe JetBrains should look at ditching Swing and moving to SWT&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.229 seconds -->

